—Why did you choose to pursue platform studies?
These are encounters that I would not have been able to encounter if I had not participated in the Platform Studies program. I found it to be an advantage to broaden my perspective through exchanges and to be able to think about things from a more multifaceted angle.
—What research themes are you currently working on?
Currently, I am conducting research on the ecology of Japanese eels in the rivers of Wakayama and Fukushima prefectures. In Wakayama, where it is warmer, eels can be caught throughout the year. Whereas in Fukushima Prefecture, eels are scarce in the winter. I was inspired to conduct this research to understand what the differences between the two were. Since eels may descend to relatively warmer waters in winter in colder regions, I am examining how eels move through rivers and oceans using passive integrated transponder tags (PIT tags).
—What have you gained through the School of Platforms program?
Even in biological research, equipment is used to obtain data, and there is always a connection to informatics when trying to advance the analysis. Thus, a deeper understanding of informatics is an advantage. In addition, the support for research funding is substantial in this area. I often go to Wakayama and Fukushima for fieldwork, making it difficult for me to work part-time on a regular schedule, but the program allows me to pursue my research while earning money as a research assistant, which is helpful as it allows for flexibility in the days I work.
—What is the platform to you (ideal situations, desirable future, etc.)?
The Japanese eel is an endangered species. However, even if we take an ecological approach to studying eels and determine the environment required for their growth in order to conserve the species, the current situation is that priority is still given to what is necessary for human livelihoods. For example, if rivers are returned to their natural state, the risk of flooding increases. Although there is a trade-off between the preservation of nature and human convenience (land development and disaster prevention), and the two need to be considered comprehensively, the impression is that each argument is treated separately in reality. It is necessary to integrate the two and find a compromise or think about the best way forward in all practicality. In fact, approximately 40% of Japan’s freshwater fish species are in danger of extinction. One of the main reasons for this is environmental change. Working with the Japanese eel as a stepping stone, I aim to create a platform that will lead to both the preservation of the natural environment and human convenience.
—If the goal is to improve the world just a little from where it stands today, what do you think is needed, or what would you like to do?
This is connected to the previous question, but I think it is essential to always consider the opposing side when making an argument and to explore the middle ground. It is not enough to just assert one’s own argument. In this era where everyone can easily assert their opinions through SNS and other means, thinking about the opposing side is essential.
back to Interview